<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Youtopia Part II: Let Persuasion Rule Over Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://athousandnations.com/2009/10/21/youtopia-part-ii-let-persuasion-rule-over-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://athousandnations.com/2009/10/21/youtopia-part-ii-let-persuasion-rule-over-power/</link>
	<description>Towards a Cambrian Explosion in Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DixieFlatline</title>
		<link>http://athousandnations.com/2009/10/21/youtopia-part-ii-let-persuasion-rule-over-power/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DixieFlatline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://athousandnations.com/?p=758#comment-1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems circular to me.  &lt;em&gt;If we could narrowly define government, we could make big gains.&lt;/em&gt;

The problem is that any government with the capacity to tax has the inclination to increase its tax base.  Constitutional prohibitions are absolutely meaningless if the state is the sole arbiter of what is constitutional or not.

While I can accept that transition will require gradualism, the notion that some gradual changes will be possible or even desirable is not a given.

The first post on territoriality was much better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems circular to me.  <em>If we could narrowly define government, we could make big gains.</em></p>
<p>The problem is that any government with the capacity to tax has the inclination to increase its tax base.  Constitutional prohibitions are absolutely meaningless if the state is the sole arbiter of what is constitutional or not.</p>
<p>While I can accept that transition will require gradualism, the notion that some gradual changes will be possible or even desirable is not a given.</p>
<p>The first post on territoriality was much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towards YouTopia: Must All Public Good Providers Remain Earthbound? &#171; Let A Thousand Nations Bloom</title>
		<link>http://athousandnations.com/2009/10/21/youtopia-part-ii-let-persuasion-rule-over-power/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Towards YouTopia: Must All Public Good Providers Remain Earthbound? &#171; Let A Thousand Nations Bloom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://athousandnations.com/?p=758#comment-943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you can find Part II to this article here.] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Babesâ€™ Blog, Week 41: Oh [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you can find Part II to this article here.] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Babesâ€™ Blog, Week 41: Oh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

