Skip to content

An Esoteric Bit of Anarcho History

April 21, 2010

I’ve previously touched on some of the ideas presented in James C. Scott’s Seeing Like A State. It’s a Hayekian account of failed attempts at centralized, technocratic command and control during the 20th century. Scott’s no libertarian–he deliberately sets himself apart from those free-wheeling rogues–but almost as if from scratch, he develops a conceptual framework that echoes Hayek’s discussion of local knowledge, planning, and emergent order. You say potato, I say potato.

At the Beacon Blog, Peter Klein has posted a thought-provoking excerpt from Scott’s newest book, The Art of Not Being Governed: an Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia:

At a time when the state seems pervasive and inescapable, it is easy to forget that for much of history, living within or outside the state — or in an intermediate zone — was a choice, one that might be revised as the circumstances warranted. A wealthy and peaceful state center might attract a growing population that found its advantages rewarding. This, of course, fits the standard civilizational narrative of rude barbarians mesmerized by the prosperity made possible by the king’s peace and justice — a narrative shared by most of the world’s salvational religions, not to mention Thomas Hobbes.

This narrative ignores two capital facts. First, as we have noted, it appears that much, if not most, of the population of the early states was unfree; they were subjects under duress. The second fact, most inconvenient for the standard narrative of civilization, is that it was very common for state subjects to run away. Living within the state meant, virtually by definition, taxes, conscription, corvée labor, and, for most, a condition of servitude; these conditions were at the core of the state’s strategic and military advantages. When these burdens became overwhelming, subjects moved with alacrity to the periphery or to another state. . . . And, finally, the early states were warmaking machines as well, producing hemorrhages of subjects fleeing conscription, invasion, and plunder. Thus the early state extruded populations as readily as it absorbed them, and when, as was often the case, it collapsed altogether as the result of war, dought, epidemic, or civil strife over succession, its populations were disgorged. . . . For long periods people moved in and out of states, and “stateness” was, itself, often cyclical and reversible.

Klein notes, “The book traces the history of ‘Zomia,’ an isolated, upland region stretching across seven Southeast Asian countries. Scott’s thesis is that its inhabitants chose a particular culture and lifestyle — farming technology, housing, social structures, language, art, and so on — for the specific purpose of avoiding entanglement with the coercive state.”

Developing technology, housing, and social structures to avoid entanglement with a coercive state…I wonder where I’ve heard that before. Oh yeah.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: