If This Be Keynesianism…
From an interview with Paul Romer in the China Daily:
“It’s possible to do something that’s very different. It’s hard for people to believe that just a little fishing port could grow into a huge successful city like Hong Kong,” Romer said.
Keynesians extol the city’s achievement as an “economic miracle.” In a short span of five decades, Hong Kong has grown from a city with a GDP per capita that was lower than that of its poorest African counterparts into one that is richer than the vast majority of countries across the globe, helped by a combination of factors such as the rule of law, its laissez-faire economic policies and a government that has made doing business and earning a living relatively easy.
Really? If by Keynesianism you mean rule of law and free trade, then, well, okay I guess.
Comments are closed.
Let A Thousand Nations Bloom 
Under the bonnet, Audi claims the new facelifted A4 will be offered
with a range of engines that is 11 percent more fuel efficient than the current
generation, despite a significant increase in power and torque
output. Nathan Newman is world renowned for his advanced cosmetic
surgery procedures. This will give an assurance that the
treatment which has offered is effective and suitable for
you.
KING RAT, TAI PAN, NOBLE HOUSE, SHOGUN, WHIRLWIND, GAI JIN. Lots of good stuff there, and if it’s not to your taste in the end… you can never have too many doorstops.
And when you’re through Clavell, for something in a different mode, there are about twenty murder mysteries set in modern (1970’s, 1980’s) Hong Kong by William Marshall, which are also worth a read. Not to mention a few films have been set there.
I’ve never read any Clavell. Looks fun. Thanks for the tip.
In 1950, Hong Kong had 2,200,000 residents. You’re quite sure it was just a fishing port?
In 1960, there were an estimated 3 million residents. James Clavell wrote one of his major novels, NOBLE HOUSE, which was situated in Hong Kong of 1962. There were fishermen in the book, but that wasn’t exactly the whole of the plot — which basically centered around HK being already “a huge sucessful city” which was growing like gangbusters.
Where has Paul Romer been for the past 60 years?
From wikipedia:
“Under British rule, the population of Hong Kong island had increased from 7,450 Chinese residents, mostly fishermen, in 1841 to over 115,000 Chinese and 8,754 Europeans in Hong Kong (including Kowloon) in 1870”
Either Romer misspoke and meant 1850’s instead of 1950’s, or the writer of the article (the same one responsible for the baffling Keynesian reference) got it wrong and thought he meant the 1950’s.
Either way it was definitely merely a fishing village on an unappealing hunk of rock when the British took it over.